UNESCO approves Palestinian membership bid

Standard

By Gregg Carlstrom
October 31, 2011

The Palestinian bid received 107 yes votes, while 14 countries voted against and 52 others abstained.

The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) voted on Monday to admit Palestine as a member, a move which is likely to cause the US government to cut off tens of millions of dollars in annual funding to the body.

The Palestinian bid received 107 “yes” votes during a UNESCO meeting in Paris, with 14 countries voting against and 52 abstaining, enough to satisfy a two-thirds majority of those countries present and voting.

The decision grants full membership to Palestine, which allows it to register certain sites, like the Church of the Nativity, in UNESCO’s World Heritage register.

It is a small victory for the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), which filed a bid last month for full membership at the UN.

The bid has been stalled for weeks at the UN Security Council, and will likely face a US veto when it comes to a vote.

The “yes” vote at UNESCO will add at least symbolic weight to the PLO’s argument that the UN should recognise a Palestinian state.

“It’s good news. It’s another step in the right direction,” said Husam Zomlot, a PLO member and former ambassador.

“We’re marching towards full status in the international system. UNESCO is a very important organisation.”

Israel was quick to criticise the decision: Nimrod Barkan, the Israeli representative to UNESCO, called the vote “tragic for the idea of UNESCO”.

US funding cut?

Israel voted against the measure, as did the US, Canada and several European countries, including Germany. The UK abstained, while France voted in favour.

Ahmed Yousef, a Hamas official and the deputy foreign minister in Gaza, called it a “great achievement” and said the vote “shows that Israel and America are not dictating politics to the world anymore”.

Mouin Rabbani, an analyst at the Institute for Palestinian Studies in Amman, said the vote would make it harder for those countries to successfully oppose Palestinian efforts for recognition.

“What they’re doing is developing leverage over the Americans, the Europeans, the Israelis, so these parties begin to take them more seriously,” Rabbani said.

The vote will almost certainly trigger a US law, passed in 1990, which bars the US from funding any UN agency “which accords the Palestine Liberation Organisation the same standing as member states”.

The US provides about $80m per year, or 22 per cent of the agency’s total budget.

David Killion, the US representative at UNESCO, said the decision would “complicate our ability to support UNESCO,” and reiterated the Obama adminstration’s past criticism of Palestinian bids for UN recognition.

“The only way forward to the Palestinian state we seek is through negotiations,” Killion said. “We believe efforts such as what we have seen today are counterproductive.”

The president can often override such laws with a so-called “national security waiver”; these waivers allow the PLO to maintain a mission in Washington, for example, despite a 1987 law barring it.

But the 1990 law on UN funding, and a similar measure passed in 1994, do not provide the option of a waiver.

Victoria Nuland, a spokeswoman for the US state department, would not say whether the US was pressuring Congress to issue such a waiver.

“We are not going to create a Palestinian state at UNESCO,” Nuland said last week. “There are consequences if UNESCO votes in this direction.”

The European Union tried to stop the PLO bid by offering them limited membership on UNESCO’s executive committee, and funds to renovate the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, believed to be the birthplace of Jesus.

The PLO rejected that offer, with one official telling the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz that “the EU [was] trying to tempt us with money to sell our principles”.

Source

About B.J. Murphy

I'm a young socialist and Transhumanist activist within the East Coast region, who writes for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET), India Future Society, and Serious Wonder. I'm also the Social Media Manager for Serious Wonder, an Advisory Board Member for the Lifeboat Foundation, and a Co-Editor for Fight Back! News.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s